Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Ronald Slobodchikov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Slobodchikov analysis and find out who is favored!
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Ronald Slobodchikov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 48.21% of points on his second serve, while Slobodchikov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 56.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Slobodchikov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.81% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 61.11% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Slobodchikov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 68% of matches played (W/L 51/ 24), with Slobodchikov winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 287/ 157), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Slobodchikov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 205/ 134), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 27% (W/L 6/ 16).
- Player level: In the last year, Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.14% of matches (W/L 43/ 15), where as Slobodchikov has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carabelli winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 2 and Slobodchikov winning 0. The last match between Carabelli and Slobodchikov was at the Biella 7 Challenger, 30-05-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:53:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carabelli and Slobodchikov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Carabelli winning 0 times and Slobodchikov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Carabelli winning 0, and Slobodchikov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 275.17 while Slobodchikov has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Slobodchikov has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 46.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Slobodchikov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Carabelli 1 - 0 Slobodchikov
107
Rank
96
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
384
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
63% (316-182)
Career Total W/L
57% (218-162)
69% (27-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$130,440
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carabelli VS Slobodchikov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Ronald Slobodchikov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:53:41 | 0:53:41 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (27/40) | 43% (18/42) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (19/27) | 72% (13/18) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 85% (11/13) | 25% (6/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (23/42) | 25% (10/40) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Carabelli VS Slobodchikov H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Ronald Slobodchikov
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
43%
(
18 of
42)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Ronald Slobodchikov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (27/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (56/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (476/400) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (25/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 92 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 82 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:34 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.62 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1793/2838) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (1213/1793) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (510/1045) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (145/312) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (1217/2862) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 81% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (25/37) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 53% (10/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (16/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Nicolas Zanellato
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
57 of
84)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Ronald Slobodchikov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Francisco Cabral
Player
Ronald Slobodchikov
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Player
Ronald Slobodchikov
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Ronald Slobodchikov
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
43%
(
18 of
42)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Catarina
Player
Ronald Slobodchikov
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexey Vatutin
Player
Ronald Slobodchikov
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Ronald Slobodchikov
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ronald Slobodchikov
Player
Arthur Fils
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Ronald Slobodchikov
40%
(
19 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandr Binda
Player
Ronald Slobodchikov
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve %
64%
(
16 of
25)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
11 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29
Total Points Won
15
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Carabelli Vs Slobodchikov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
